photo credit: Lyn Topinka 2005
photo credit: Lyn Topinka 2005
Recent Posts
Smohalla (1815?-1895), center, in white, Priest Rapids,
1884 Courtesy National Anthropological Archives, Smithsonian Institution (Image No. BAE GN 02903A 06468100) |
Smohalla (1815?-1895) and followers outside his lodge, Priest Rapids, 1884Courtesy National Anthropological Archives, Smithsonian Institution (Neg. No. 2903 B) |
"I was sorry you could not come Sun. to our feast. We had a big crowd. Indians came from Toppenish, Wapato, White Swan and one man from Nespelum. We had a nice day for it. All the Indians have gone out to work. Some in Moxee, some Sunnyside, some Grandview. Just me and my wife are left here. I have to watch the horses. Maybe I sell them all soon. Then we go to the horn to fish. Well I guess that is all. Everybody is well. We are not going to Soap Lake this year. Write here to White Bluffs" (McWhorter Collection Cage 55, Box 41, Folder 396).
Wanapum replica village, Lewis and Clark Bicentennial, Sacajawea State Park, Pasco, 2005Photo by Elizabeth Gibson |
"If I did not misunderstand the chief, there are but three men in the band with some nine or ten women, composed mostly of widows, of course, and some six or seven children. These Indians have never been amalgamated with any Indian reservations, but have always resided at the Priest’s Raids, entirely self-supporting, working every season in the Yakima Hop yards, and potato fields, harvesting and general ranch work. They are reliable and respected by the whites where ever known. Their simple honesty cannot be gainsaid.
These few Indians pray that they be permitted to catch and dry or smoke-cure enough salmon to tide them through the winter. They do not ask permission to catch fish commercially, do not expect to or want to catch for any other purpose that their own winter’s use; as such has ever been their principal source of food supply (McWhorter Collection Cage 55, Box 41, Folder 396).McWhorter used his influence with the Washington State Historical Society, with which he was a curator, to support his plea. The society adopted a motion of sympathy basing their supposition on the general treaty rights of the Indians. McWhorter also went to the Washington State Legislature, where a House Resolution was prepared on behalf of the Wanapum. Fisheries Director Brennen opposed the measure chiefly because he feared that the Indians would abuse their rights and fish commercially. McWhorter wrote to Brennen, pledging on his word that the Wanapum would not fish commercially. He told the director that whites at White Bluff’s had told John Buck to just take the fish the Indians need in secret. John Buck refused to do this and dictated a statement of his simple plea, which was included in the letter to Brennen: “I want to catch salmon and want white man to catch salmon but I don’t want to break no law, and if we can catch salmon we can live (McWhorter Collection Cage 55, Box 41, Folder 396).
"This, small band of Indians, numbering thirty-six people, with two head men, is known to the general public as the Priest Rapids band of landless Indians. They call themselves the Wana-pom tribe, which simply means River Indians. This small group of Indians are the survivors of the once powerful Sokulks.McWhorter tried to arrange a deal between the federal government and the Rothrock Cattle Company, which owned much of the land in the Priest Rapids vicinity. He spoke to company president F. M. Rothrock who indicated his “willingness to sell a scope of this range if bought for the Indians, at a far less price than valued by a practical stock man, who is interested in the fate of these Indians which is inevitable soon or later” (McWhorter Collection Cage 55, Box 41, Folder 396).
"When the treaties negotiated by Governor Isaac Stevens were in the process of being made, the Sokulks were overlooked. Today they are living as squatters on land which is now in the hands of a land company and under lease as a sheep ranch.
"These Indians are self supporting. They live in the ancient manner of their ancestors and observe the religious rites of a period long since forgotten by most of their contemporary tribes" (McWhorter Collection Cage 55, Box 41, Folder 396).
"Is it not possible to secure a small scope of the Rothrock ranch, enough for a home for these truly interesting, and hapless people? Range sufficient for their small band of horses or possibly sheep? They are industrious hones and hold the respect of all the whites of the White Bluffs settlement, every citizen attesting to their good standing collectively when petitioning the State Legislature to pass an act permitting them taking salmon for their own table only" (McWhorter Collection Cage 55, Box 41, Folder 396).F. M. Rothrock offered to sell six sections of land totaling nearly 4,000 acres. Rothrock stated that he was willing to sell the land for as little as $2.00 per acre if the transaction was settled quickly. The land offered was not the land where the Wanapum village was at, however. The Rothrock Company did own land fronting the Columbia River, but this they did not want to sell. For this and other reasons the deal was never consummated and the Wanapum continued to live on land owned by others.
"You knew the army took a lot of their range and I don’t know what I will do this summer with my horses. I’m watching them now but pretty soon they will have the feed eaten up, and I don’t know what I’ll do. I want to sell most of my horses -- maybe you know some men [who] want to by [sic] some of them" (McWhorter Collection Cage 55, Box 41, Folder 396).
Webmaster: Terry Henderson All rights reserved Copyright © 2014